Errore sul database di WordPress: [INSERT, UPDATE command denied to user 'lafornackydbdbdb'@'10.9.103.34' for table 'laforn_wfconfig']
INSERT INTO laforn_wfconfig (name, val, autoload) values ('lastPermissionsTemplateCheck', '1624601648', 'yes') ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE val = '1624601648', autoload = 'yes'

Errore sul database di WordPress: [INSERT, UPDATE command denied to user 'lafornackydbdbdb'@'10.9.103.34' for table 'laforn_wfconfig']
INSERT INTO laforn_wfconfig (name, val, autoload) values ('previousWflogsFileList', '[\".htaccess\",\"config-synced.php\",\"config.php\",\"ips.php\",\"config-livewaf.php\",\".nfs00000000104b254400015be7\",\".nfs000000000fd5af0000015719\",\".nfs000000000b1ba6be000162d2\",\".nfs000000000a4ced3d000157af\",\".nfs000000000a4cd7230001c236\",\"rules.php\",\".nfs000000000f8449fa0001273b\",\"attack-data.php\",\".nfs000000000f02aa8100012d4b\",\".nfs000000001041c920000153d1\",\"config-transient.php\",\"template.php\",\".nfs000000000f0dc5d300016b9f\",\"GeoLite2-Country.mmdb\"]', 'yes') ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE val = '[\".htaccess\",\"config-synced.php\",\"config.php\",\"ips.php\",\"config-livewaf.php\",\".nfs00000000104b254400015be7\",\".nfs000000000fd5af0000015719\",\".nfs000000000b1ba6be000162d2\",\".nfs000000000a4ced3d000157af\",\".nfs000000000a4cd7230001c236\",\"rules.php\",\".nfs000000000f8449fa0001273b\",\"attack-data.php\",\".nfs000000000f02aa8100012d4b\",\".nfs000000001041c920000153d1\",\"config-transient.php\",\"template.php\",\".nfs000000000f0dc5d300016b9f\",\"GeoLite2-Country.mmdb\"]', autoload = 'yes'

Errore sul database di WordPress: [INSERT, UPDATE command denied to user 'lafornackydbdbdb'@'10.9.103.34' for table 'laforn_wfconfig']
INSERT INTO laforn_wfconfig (name, val, autoload) values ('serverDNS', '1624601648;75;178.32.140.171', 'yes') ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE val = '1624601648;75;178.32.140.171', autoload = 'yes'

Errore sul database di WordPress: [INSERT, UPDATE command denied to user 'lafornackydbdbdb'@'10.9.103.34' for table 'laforn_options']
INSERT INTO `laforn_options` (`option_name`, `option_value`, `autoload`) VALUES ('_transient_doing_cron', '1624601649.4289739131927490234375', 'yes') ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE `option_name` = VALUES(`option_name`), `option_value` = VALUES(`option_value`), `autoload` = VALUES(`autoload`)

Chase Paymentech denied re payment solution on her condom business, arguing “reputational danger.” – La Fornacella

Chase Paymentech denied re payment solution on her condom business, arguing “reputational danger.”

Chase Paymentech denied re payment solution on her condom business, arguing “reputational danger.”

Therefore back into Tiffany Gaines. As it happens that the lobby that is new called the 3rd Party Payment Processors Association basically threatened Capitol Hill lawmakers which they would do precisely this 2-3 weeks ago:

…banks, re re payment processing organizations and a lobbying that is relatively new called the 3rd Party Payment Processors Association happen going wild on Capitol Hill in present months over quite a main-stream police force effort by having a salacious title: procedure Choke Point. The project tries to curb cash laundering by examining banking institutions and re re payment processors that facilitate deals with illegal companies — petty fraudsters operating lending that is payday, sham telemarketing operations as well as other shady teams

Democrats in Congress state the 3rd Party Payment Processors Association — a lobby team that formed just last year in a reaction to process Choke Point — has given comparable warnings in personal conferences.

“They arrived in right here and said, ‘How do you need it whenever we began cutting down things liberals like, like birth prevention?‘” says one home Democratic aide who came across utilizing the TPPPA in November.

Therefore we must eliminate morality away from payments because it is dangerous.

“They can designate reputation danger centered on their ethical judgements, but everyone has different ethical judgments,” TPPPA President Marsha Jones told HuffPost. “That’s the risk from it. One management is polarized a proven way therefore the other another means. ”

The TPPPA’s stance is absurd. Once more, DoJ’s presentation had been pretty clear: they’re interested in organizations that produced plenty of customer complaints, or that delivered high rates of unauthorized comes back or charge-backs. A condom business attempting to sell a product that is perfectly legal nothing at all to do with it.

I talked to Tiffany Gaines Friday that is last We asked her if Lovability produced a large amount of consumer complaints. “No, perhaps not at all,” she said. I inquired if she got great deal of comes back or charge-backs. “No, we’ve never ever also had one return,” she responded. Lovability must not have raised any warning flag from Chase Paymentech, whom Gaines desired to make use of because she had all her business reports with Chase. The thing near is a area that warns against “merchants attempting to sell dubious products.” But that actually relates to whether or not the merchants stick to the legislation, and needless to state, Gaines wouldn’t normally characterize condoms with in an of themselves as debateable (nor would I).

This is why exactly what probably took place here.

The TPPPs are intentionally Operation that is interpreting Choke extremely broadly, to come up with complaints and embarrass the regulators into calling from the dogs. Zach Carter of HuffPo heard of this too, but I’ll just relay what Gaines told me personally relating to this discussion:

The advertising administrator for Chase Paymentech, she became alert to my situation through the news. She first stated it had been a bad judgment call on the part, in addition they would consent to process our re re re payments. I stated just what can you do in order to make certain this does not take place once more.

Exactly Exactly Just How Chase Bank Denying Services to a Condom Shop Is Actually About Deregulating Payday Lending

Beneath the odd conventions of journalism, if another person writes about an interest, particularly if it resembles a “scoop,” no one else can come up with it. Therefore then you see it in your friendly neighborhood copy of The Huffington Post, you can basically stop chasing if you go down the road for a week or so chasing a story and. Many thanks for using meals away from my lips, HuffPo!

However in this situation, the complicated story in question warrants more attention, since it’s a truly good concept in exactly just just how “lobbying” includes more than simply having to pay rich individuals in suits to sweet-talk politicians and regulators. Here is the darker part of lobbying, with all the venerated “small companies” everybody loves to deify caught within the crossfire.

The small company owner listed here is called Tiffany Gaines, plus the company, Lovability Condoms.

In mid-March, an unit of JPMorgan Chase rejected a software to process payments for the fledgling New York City condom company Lovability, citing risk that is“reputational connected with “adult” products. Ridicule and mockery predictably ensued. But Chase’s choice wasn’t an remote gaffe that is corporate it is the latest, weirdest item to emerge from the subculture of startup lobbying groups, fringe tea party hyperventilists and small-time crooks that have invested months fighting an easy crackdown on money laundering.

That unit of JPM, Chase Paymentech, is really a third-party repayment processor (TPPP). Banking institutions utilize automated Clearing House (ACH) to clear payments, and also the payment that is third-party prospect companies that require re payment solutions and link them into the banking institutions. In this situation, Chase Paymentech is actually owned by JPM, causeing this to be even more confusing (they’re perhaps not really a 3rd party but the financial institution by themselves). Back into Chase Paymentech, Tiffany Gaines and Lovability in a minute.

The Justice Department, along with banking regulators OCC and FDIC, have told banks to look critically at their relationships with TPPPS in a rare move designed to actually enforce the law. Formerly, TPPPs provided the banking institutions payday loans VA plausible deniability to make use of the scummiest of predatory operators. If those companies scammed customers, the lender would merely say they didn’t understand whom the TPPP introduced, effectively moving the reputational danger. Procedure Chokepoint, the Justice Department effort, held banking institutions more accountable for these relationships.

DoJ, in many different presentations with banking institutions, told them to consider companies probably be committing fraudulence. In specific, they said to red-flag companies that produce a complete lot of customer complaints, or had high prices of unauthorized comes back or charge-backs. This really is currently the obligation of this banking institutions, through the dubious task Reports they need to register whether they have knowledge that a customer involved with cash laundering.

When I noted in an account for The Guardian final thirty days, an important target of Operation Chokepoint may be the payday financing industry.

Recently, payday financing has migrated to your Web. Online payday lenders set up shop in jurisdictions without much regulation – some on Indian reservations – and market shady loans nationwide, even yet in states which have rate of interest caps or other limitations. They can’t repeat this without use of the re re payment system – basically the payday lender gets use of the average person borrower’s banking account to debit costs, with all the loans rolling over unless the debtor jumps through a lot of hoops to pay for them right straight right back. The banks pocket giant costs through the payday lenders, in return for ACH access.

Rather than chasing fly-by-night payday lenders that close 1 day and start under another title the following, DoJ made a decision to target banking institutions for employing lawbreakers. Presumably, after an adequate amount of a crackdown, the marketplace works its magic, and banks would will not make use of TPPPs that registered online payday loan providers, due to the danger of prosecution. Process Chokepoint currently nailed one bank, Four Oaks, with this type of task (the $1 million settlement had been reasonably significant for such a little bank). The costs banking institutions have from TPPPs are profitable, and DoJ’s action amounts the playing industry significantly.

Leave a Comment

Il tuo indirizzo email non sarà pubblicato. I campi obbligatori sono contrassegnati *